COVID #9: Why Most Challenges to the Vaccine Are Invalid
Never heard at a car dealership: “Do you have the data to prove that this brand of tires works with this car? I read on Facebook that these tires sometimes explode for no reason.”
Never heard at a cellphone store: “I’m not buying this thing until you take it apart and show me how it works. I heard they cause cancer and I wan’t to see the design plans for myself.”
Never heard at a restaurant: “Where did the flour in this bread come from? I read something online about Canadian wheat that was infected with a fungus. I want to see the receipt for the flour.”
Never heard at an electronics store: “I read online that these flat screen TVs emit X-rays and cause sterility. I want to see your Geiger counter.”
Heard every day at a doctor’s office: “I read this vaccine gets into your DNA and causes leukemia in 10 years. Show me the data that proves it isn’t true.”
People have a right to have the science behind their medical care explained to them. They have a right to refuse medical care they do not feel is appropriate. But it is neither logical nor fair to expect medical professionals to rebut every rumor that surfaces on the internet. Not only does this take too much time, but it forces doctors and nurses to explain away objections that are irrelevant to medical reasoning.
If you want to know how a vaccine works, I can explain that to you. If you want to know how it was developed and tested, I can outline that for you as well. If you want to know what my professional experience is with the COVID vaccine, I have that information.
But I can’t explain to you why the COVID vaccine doesn’t magnetize people. It just doesn’t. There is no why. I can’t explain why ivermectin doesn’t work. It just doesn’t. No evidence that it does, full stop.
The way science works is that you set up an experiment and run it. Then you gather the data and see what the data says. For the most part, if the data shows that the drug works, you don’t investigate why it doesn’t magnetize people. You don’t investigate why it doesn’t cause cancer, if there is no evidence that it does.
There is no evidence that pancakes cause brain tumors. Since there is no link, you don’t waste your time trying to explain why not. It just doesn’t, that’s all.
A fair challenge to a medical treatment such as a vaccine has to be based in evidence. If you can’t produce evidence that the vaccine causes sterility (and there is none), then you can’t challenge it that way. No doctor, or nurse, or scientist should be made to answer questions that have no evidence behind them.
